Is there a point at which it becomes economically more feasible to turn the distribution of power over to Rocky Mountain Power to achieve greater efficiency on a larger scale?

Kaysville City can currently provide safe and reliable service at lower rates (approximately 15%) than those offered to Rocky Mountain Power customers. As a municipal utility, Kaysville City does not collect a return on capital for investors and is not subject to income taxes. These two items alone provide a significant cost benefit when compared to an investor owned utility. In addition, Kaysville City is a participant in UAMPS projects with other municipal utilities, an arrangement that provides leverage to maximize efficiency and scale in the electric generation and transmission markets.

Show All Answers

1. Does increased demand as result of population growth result in higher power rates to the city for consuming incrementally more power?
2. Are impact fees assessed to developers to cover the cost of distribution lines to previously undeveloped areas of the city or are these expenses borne by all electrical users?
3. Is there a point at which it becomes economically more feasible to turn the distribution of power over to Rocky Mountain Power to achieve greater efficiency on a larger scale?
4. Wouldn’t it be better to rely on the resources of a major power company like Rocky Mountain than to rely on the city’s limited resources?
5. How does the city power department evaluate the efficiency and expense levels of its fixed cost structure?